"Pardon my French, but after checking out a list of The Business Journals' list of the best candidates for NHL expansion or relocation, my instant reaction was: "Quoi?!?"

(Translation for even less fluent fellow Canadians: "What?!?")

In a clear case of nerdy number-crunching gone horribly wrong, the outrageous report shows what happens when you take common sense, history and rational human though out of a 'study' and leave it to the brains of a computer, or mathematically minded human being posing as one.

Quebec City — easily the most logical destination for the next NHL team to call home, either because the league believes it needs to grow or because one of its already flailing franchises needs to be transplanted — was way down that list.

Ranked No. 31 of 58 North American cities on the list that ranks them from "sufficient" to "borderline" and finally "insufficient," the former home of the Nordiques falls in the middle category.

Hamilton was down there, too, ranked 33rd behind places like Honolulu, Hawaii, Orlando, Fla., and Tulsa, Okla.

Meanwhile, Atlanta — land of a pair of former NHL franchises that now call Calgary and Winnipeg home — was just outside of the top 10 in 11th spot thanks to what the study estimates as a US$51.8-billion available income base — the amount earned by all of its residents in 2010.

As entertaining as random studies like this one can sometimes be, anyone who takes the results seriously is as nutty as the person who decided to put it together, or maybe even the guy who decided to write about it.

Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif., ranks first, with Houston a close second.

Las Vegas, Virginia Beach, and Providence are also in the top 10."